Birthright

 Completely clarify the issue of human rights
Mao Yushi
1) Why human rights are the birthright?
Because any one person, can equal enjoyment of human rights, which do not need other people to make sacrifices, and he therefore do not have any obligation. Other rights often apply only to certain groups, such as civil rights, it applies only to citizens of a country. When he was terminated when the country's citizens, no longer able to enjoy. and He enjoys the time when civil rights must also assume a certain obligation, such as military service. and human rights is different, no matter what state a person is, he will always have the right to enjoyment of human rights.
2) Since it is an innate human rights right, what the next person will not get the human rights situation?
when someone violation of his, and violators can be bound. is a violation of human rights is lost. Conversely, if no one can infringe other people and unconstrained, then under the protection of human rights in.
3) What is the privilege?
to violations of others without restriction, is to have the privilege of the people. In general, a person who violated someone else He will be punished. beating, scratching, grabbing other people's property, etc. are all violations of others. guilty of such crimes will be punished by law. But in some societies, some people enjoy such privileges. such as imperial times the emperor, he can kill, confiscate other people's property (raid), no law can restrict him. In modern society, this blatant privileges gradually reduced, but also to all the privileges the existence of hidden forms. others Some people even open criticism is not allowed, let alone take the law to sanction him.
strictly speaking, in addition to the rights of human rights are all outside the privilege. For example, I join a social group, the delivery fee, to become one of the one. I enjoy the privilege of membership. However, this privilege is different from the above-mentioned privileges with respect to human rights. The so-called privilege with respect to human rights refers to a person to escape legal sanction, or that the law currently is not equal. So the basis of human rights and the rule of law.
Thus, privileges and human rights are mutually antagonistic. With the privilege to not have human rights, in order to have human rights, we must cancel the privilege. Therefore, the abolition of the privilege, naturally on human rights there. We do not need to put forward the slogan of establishing human rights, the real need is to abolish the privilege. privilege is the enemy of human rights.
4) Why is everyone can enjoy human rights?
is no cost for the rights of human rights. A human rights community, do not therefore need to pay the extra cost. and other rights have corresponding costs. Since the enjoyment of human rights do not need to pay the costs, each person has the right to enjoy it. it does not require any other person to do this and pay the price. or that human rights do not need anyone any obligation to this end. only ask others not to infringe it.
5) Since the enjoyment of human rights do not cost, how it takes the cost of protection of human rights?
human society since ancient times used to be a privileged community. just awakening after a long struggle of the people, before slowly entering into the human rights community. in society from the privileges of the process into the human rights community, people paid a heavy price , often tens of thousands of lives. This is the struggle against the privileges of oppression. has been universally recognized human rights, who did not dare to openly oppose the human rights, but also those who enjoy the privileges of a variety of techniques to deceive the masses, deception the masses, keeping some of their own privileges. the world to do endless violations of human rights, to protect those who are privileged people who abuse it is very difficult to do, is to pay a huge price to do. here, including prosecution, evidence, the court debate, decisions and so on. sometimes the law can not prevail in a country, but also complained to the International Tribunal, the cost is very high.
6) a person to enjoy human rights, there is no obligation?
human rights is not its corresponding obligations of the right. a baby is born, he has not the ability to fulfill its obligations, but he has human rights. of human rights does not mean others do not need the cost for him to pay costs. the meaning of human rights are not obligations of his own do not have to do this pay costs.
7) What specific human rights, including rights?
obligations to others who do not need, nor will the rights of others losses, are human rights. Conversely, if a person enjoyed certain rights will lead to the loss of others, or so to pay the cost of this power can only be a privilege, rather than human rights.
human rights including the right to life. because a person's life the same without prejudice to the survival of others. But in the sea on a small board, food and fresh water supply is limited, a person's life becomes privilege. because in this case, not everyone can equally survive. a person's life to the death of others, the cost, so the survival is no longer a human right. Fortunately the resources on the planet is still relatively abundant, do not limit the survival of others to protect a person's survival. so can be a human right to life.
freedom of speech, human rights, because a person does not comment prevent other people to express their views, does not prevent other rights of others. But when a person's speech hindered human rights of others, this statement does not belong to human rights. such as abetting others to kill, to steal and so on. Thus, a ban people to express their views is a flagrant violation of human rights. of the press censorship is violating human rights.
listening rights are human rights. because one hears an opinion, not lead to violation of others, but not affect others The same human rights. listen, is a completely passive behavior, just listen, not harm. So the interference of foreign radio stations is a violation of human rights. More generally, access to information is a basic human right. This is not just listening, but also see different views, including materials and so on. we tend to emphasize only the freedom of speech, if not hear, or the freedom of access to information, the light allows people say, tell who will listen to it? no one hears words are meaningless.
Life is not a part of human rights violations. people have the right not to be cursed. or hit someone a violation of human rights. including the police and other rights of any person not hit or swear.
freedom of movement of human rights. a human action does not affect other people's actions, unless such action resulted in prejudice to others. So one is detained human rights violations. the man handcuffed together a human rights violation.
of goods or property ownership is human rights. means that everyone is equally entitled to certain things. ancient slave to no ownership of property, because he himself is not his own, how can the ownership of the property. It should be noted that ownership is a right, everyone's equal ownership. but the items have a specific ownership is a privilege. A B no longer have to have it. The reason is very simple, if two people can have the same the ownership, would not cause conflict. To avoid this conflict, we must provide for the privilege of exclusive objects. But everyone can have something, or a thing, or property. the concept of protection of private property , that is, the recognition of ownership rights.
8) What happens next person to be deprived of their human rights?
If a person who commits the law, according to the law he may have to be deprived of certain rights, such as the right to freedom of movement . in the past for serious offenders to be sentenced to death, that have been deprived of his right to life. Now most of the world countries have abolished the death penalty, the general trend is to completely abolish the death penalty.
even for criminals, some of his human rights by law to be canceled, but he owned other human rights are still protected. such as the cancellation of prisoners the right to freedom of action, was in prison. but he is still the right to personal inviolability protected. Anyone who can not beat him , to give him Shangxing hungry he and so on. Over the past treatment of war prisoners are often violations of their human rights, they were playing were scolded or insulted. Ancient kill prisoners of war is very common thing. modern kind of thing is strictly banned. The United Nations has a special law, the provisions of the rights enjoyed by prisoners of war. recently exposed the U.S. military abuse of prisoners, the opposition all over the world. With this large-scale abuse of prisoners of war critics, in the future that it might be reduced. < br> For the decision of the suspects have not yet even there is no reason to give him Shangxing, engage in confession under duress. public security departments in order to prevent coerced confessions out the letter, the law suspects the right to remain silent. he has the right not to answer the prosecution of public security departments or his questions. is not simply relying on statements from people convicted. conviction depends on evidence.
9) Why should we focus on human rights?
since split into the right to human society and the powerless since the community never stability over. The reason is simple, powerless oppressed, no complaints, had to take risks, to take the revolutionary approach, and seek liberation. But even revolution, if you can not solve the issue of human rights, society is still divided into those with and without the right to the right person, the revolution will still occur. This is thousands of years of human history a brief description. Many thinkers for thousands of years trying to solve the problem of social injustice, made all kinds of suggestions. as advocated by the benevolent Confucian, Legalist proposed the rule of law, democratic modern society and elections, and so advertised. These progressive ideas are great, but not clear enough, not clear, easily misinterpreted, distorted and exploited by people with ulterior motives. Finally, for each concept of human rights the most direct individual. it comparatively difficult to be misinterpreted. No matter what system, if human rights can not be guaranteed, it must be a bad system. Conversely, if a human rights system can be seriously implemented, will be able to protect the community stable, and will not do a people displaced. concept of human rights or human rights standards, relatively easy to determine whether it is really a form of government for the people, or phoney, surface and do another, behind another set.
10) is Who is violating human rights?
occur between the individual and each individual violation. but in general there will be government to deal with, at least in theory. This individual and between individuals of each violation, will never be completely eliminated. But we do not therefore do nothing, because the government should be able to stop this from happening, the Government's main task is to deal with personal law issues. The real cause for concern is that the Government violated its people. So raise human rights issues, which for sex is against the government came. People can not do without government, because there are a lot of someone to manage public affairs. The Government is the people's mandate, with authority. otherwise unable to implement effective management. but did not think organized government, the government itself become a source of the problem is that it is often violated others, destruction of human rights. This phenomenon is the emergence of human society for thousands of years the Government has been constantly happening. China's foreign Almost Mo exception. to the second half of last century, the concept of universally recognized human rights, To solve the problem of government oppression of the people found a way. The basic spirit is to the primacy of human rights. any person, any government must respect human rights, protection of human rights.
11) The Government's stance on human rights?
Government's priority mission is to protect people's human rights. including the prevention of violations of each other among the citizens, but also against foreign invasion. The former is public security affairs, which belongs to national defense. These are the first of a national government to do things. So The Government should promote the protection of human rights. promote the concept of human rights, to mobilize the people together to accomplish this very important task. Modern society is post-colonial era, the colonial past have been independent of foreign invasion is essentially no longer occur. it has developed era of human rights, the invasion of other countries around the world that Exile will be and sanctions. Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait is an example. Saddam wrong this move by the United Nations imposed economic sanctions, and finally he and the Iraqi people fall into the tragic situation today. or the colonial era a century ago, power is often seize the resources of other countries and enslaving the people of other countries. Now the colonial era is over. colonies gained independence. power grab was returned to the land of other countries, grab works of art to be returned to enslave the people an apology to compensation. Petroleum food and other resources in a globalized world market, distribution, do not need to be allocated by the war. Thus the international human rights issues are gradually resolved, and human rights issues within a country but become prominent.
most autocratic government did not allow others to mention human rights issues. because of their privileges for their own interests, for fear that someone should mention the concept of human rights. or the authoritarian government of the people of blocked messages, let people know human rights such thing. less human, they can do whatever they want, the people fish. For those who are not subject to torture, disregard for human life. In fact, such policies may not be beneficial for those in power. because they stand on a volcano, maybe someday volcanic eruptions, they will perish in the fire domain. This is thousands of years of human history proves. The difference is that today's society, advanced communications, change rapidly. Over the past few decades, what happened hundreds of years, probably within a few years now occur. they figure less and less chance of luck. irreversible trend of the world to human rights.
a human rights community must also democratic society. because the authoritarian government to maintain his privileges, will infringe the human rights of ordinary people. If about human rights, there is no privileged place to go. in violation of a society that they can not resolve differences of opinion, can only discuss the consultative approach, can not be forced to yield to the approach. This is the characteristics of a democratic society. < br> a human rights community must be a market economy. if the individual's property rights are protected, to choose the exchange of personal freedom and personal access to legal disputes between the justice, the market system will be gradually established. In the past few years The reason why human society is not set up the market system, it is simply because human rights are not protected. imperial power beyond human rights, any law, rule, before the imperial power are pale. With the gradual recognition of human rights, market system has gradually been established. now the World Trade Organization established by the various systems, the starting point is the human rights of individuals against violations of individual rights to pursue the interests of the individual to choose (exchange of objects, price, entry and exit) of freedom. < br> 12) human rights issues in countries in transition What are the characteristics?
half of the last century, many former socialist countries in transition to a market economy, their political system changed from the proletarian dictatorship to a democratic rule of law. This is the world of the trend, other than exposure to this trend only a very small number of countries, their economic situation is very poor and politically unstable. The reason, with human rights. people are increasingly awakening, they asked their basic rights are not violated. the international environment is also evolving rapidly in this direction was. behind the times in the international community in the country more and more isolated. This is the world trend of the times towards human rights, is very conducive to the establishment the struggle for human rights.
in this change, many of the original does not recognize human rights, the government began to change its attitude, and gradually turned to recognized human rights. But this process is not easy. originally proposed for human rights, the challenge is actually privileged, which is equivalent to the the challenge of the original regime. dictatorial regime of human rights in the original word is not allowed to mention. strictly prohibited from the state into a can talk about human rights, often through the years. and then progress to publicly discuss, and then to discuss some substantive of human rights issues, are not easy, generally have been fighting the government in different ways. There are difficulties in understanding changes, there are vested interests opposed to the actual, more implementation problems in the administration. such as the law changes will take time and personnel to the training, organization to reorganize, to change the assessment criteria of cadres, the media and so on to adjust the terms of discourse. Overall, the time is necessary, worry is useless. in this process can occur even retrogression comeback privileged groups, human rights are threatened again. It is possible. But the irresistible trend of the world, human rights, sooner or later the times comes.
13) Why is the interaction of social rights equal society?
people and human inequality, some people refer to violations of other people, others are left at the mercy, no right to resist. generally are people serving in the government, such as police, judges, government leaders, are closest to the privileges people. They tend to grab random people off of people, beating, torture and even killing people and irresponsible. or have the ability to cover up the facts, expose their personal retaliation. in order to maintain their privilege rule. This of course, is a kind of social inequality in human society. people want to seek personal gain in the government, an official post, enter the privileged class, and then gradually promoted to a higher privileged position. So an officer is an individual pursuit. in a people equal rights in society, individuals want to improve their status, privileges can not be achieved through, but can only rely on their own, without prejudice to the pursuit of happiness under the conditions of others. The first is the creation of wealth, access to wealth. rich, and the general without prejudice to the other, on the contrary, often through cooperation, both sides benefit both the conditions are getting rich off.
Thus, equality, anti-privilege, human rights, they are all interlinked. dictatorial regime is afraid of these ideas. < br> There is also outside the government and the government colluded with access privileges to do. This is mostly rich people, they use their money to bribe the government to obtain special privileges. This is also a warning that we should guard against.
14) Human Rights society is a utopian society you?
Indeed, the people is very difficult to complete equality. because everyone will attempt to gain privileges, a chance he would do so, perhaps this is human nature. Since ancient times, has not been achieved full equality through human society. But people understand the importance of human rights, to continue to pursue human rights, when found to have violations of human rights, be corrected immediately, it is possible. we compare the world, their human rights situation is very different, good and bad. human rights situation in a good state, the government recognized the importance of human rights. Once human rights violations to be corrected immediately. such as the U.S. found that abuse of prisoners, immediately mobilize the whole society to stop. rather than clutching his cap with (of course some people trying to cover up). After this report came to light, after the possibility of similar things happening again is reduced. This effect is not only the United States, but also for all countries is a warning. the history of prisoner abuse thing What ever does not believe that a serious problem. but after this report came to light, I believe that this phenomenon can be improved in future. We have no reason to be extremely difficult to achieve absolute equality and against the human rights community that this is a utopia and to be rejected.
15) of the Government of human rights violations, how do we do?
it to two cases. First, do not recognize the concept of human rights are entirely the government, and second, those half-hearted attention to human rights countries.
do not speak of human rights in the country completely, it is not possible to improve the human rights situation from within. this time only by international pressure to improve human rights. human rights violations of people, first of all to collect evidence of violations of human rights. If there is sufficient evidence to the international human rights court can prosecute human rights violations of individuals or organizations. Although the international court can not enter those countries dictatorial grab criminals, perpetrators of human rights anywhere but under the supervision of the international community. Once there is any situation can be arrested , the prisoner can be arrested and brought to justice. such as the person to go abroad, or when the leaders of the government to change. In short, human rights violations can not be easy to get along, they will one day be subject to sanctions.
on the half- intended to talk about human rights in the country, it is possible to improve the human rights situation from within. Most of these countries signed the United Nations human rights conventions, but the double face, trying to evade the protection of human rights. This is the first to use every time (the legal framework in the country) legitimate tool for struggle. such as newspaper, radio, television and other tools. You can also organize mass demonstrations legitimate, violations of human rights complaints. mobilize international forces should also be involved in their cases to come. Generally speaking, These state laws often do not meet human rights requirements, for example, some people still insist on the dictatorship (the so-called dictatorship is not entitled to human rights), or the provisions of the law to discriminate against certain people of certain groups and so on. this time with a legal means to light seem enough, but by means other than by law, such as the organization underground, is very dangerous. so it should make full use of legal means, even if a bit slower, longer, is still worthwhile. special attention to the progress in the use of government power to promote the human rights situation improved. Governments are not monolithic, including sympathetic elements of human rights. To take advantage of their power to promote the improvement of human rights.
16) how to use the taxpayer's right to improve the human rights situation?
All governments should spend money, money come from? collected from taxpayers. So it is the taxpayers to support the government. However, the Government in turn, use their administrative privileges violated the human rights of taxpayers. This behavior is obviously very reasonable. So taxpayers have the right to explain the relationship between the government and their own. to correct the government can do whatever they want in the habit of the people, stressing that human rights are the rights of the people naturally have. The Government took the taxes the taxpayer should be for the taxpayer service, protect their human rights, not born to become leaders, and even oppress the masses. In general, authoritarian governments are reluctant to allow taxpayers to understand their economic relations and the government, like government spending fell from the sky like. relief when the victims get little help from the government, it seems that the government of Enshi. to expose such lies. modern society subjects people pay taxes and the tax is completely different era of the emperor. ancient rights of subjects is no obligation to pay taxes. subjects no say in the taxes to get the to what they do. the emperor is a ten or a hundred concubines concubine, is not ordinary people can say in the matter. modern society is different, the people satisfied that the tax, take it right to say in this money done? have not take it with in violation of people's human rights, such as support group of people devoted to the dictatorship of the police.
17) how to understand the struggle for human rights in international relations?
Department of Human Rights was originally a domestic matter, but the United Nations attention to human rights issues, and With human rights conventions, the human rights concerns into the international big things. a country do not speak of human rights is the government disgrace. Therefore, the Government of human rights against each other, exposing themselves do not like the government violated human rights. Governments are Exile does not welcome people that do not respect human rights. but the people within a country, the foreign national disgrace that the Government does not respect human rights, but added a unique opportunity to promote their human rights situation improved. of the United Nations human rights organizations every year on to evaluate the human rights situation in various countries, and dissemination of evaluation results. Every time, the government of human rights violations on the feeling of tension, fear of the provisions of human rights violations by the United Nations countries. people of all countries should make full use of the United Nations human rights forum to defend their due rights. truly focus on human rights, government should welcome others in the protection of human rights that their own inadequacies, seriously improve their human rights situation. and not fought back to take human rights as the subject of diplomatic struggle.
18) human rights and sovereignty, varies inside?
the inviolability of national sovereignty. This is a country's government has repeatedly preached the truth. As for why the inviolability of sovereignty, the very few to provide an explanation, it seems that this is not explained, the natural and reasonable. However, the reason why sovereignty useful precisely because it can protect people's human rights. countries the people this organization is really needed. First of all it can to resist foreign aggression. can not resist foreign aggression people must be conquered without human rights, foreigners can easily catch you , off you and kill you. how can you not sovereignty. Second, it can guarantee security. and then followed by the provision of public services. If the state government can not guarantee human rights, but also violated the human rights of the people, so what the government wants it to use. see human rights before sovereignty. Conversely, if not sovereignty, but a good guarantee the human rights of the people, sovereignty, there does not matter. Engels once said that when a country's people can not stand the oppression of rulers, the wait for them to have the invasion of alien They may be better some day. This explains the emphasis on the sovereignty of human rights. Sovereignty is virtual, and human rights are real. especially in today's world, more and more between the countries is not easy to infringement of sovereignty, the United Nations in the prevention of violations of sovereignty played an important role. Thus the human rights issue but has become an important subject of international concern. excuse for the inviolability of sovereignty and human rights abuses in China, more and more intense international criticism. a person in need survival and freedom. did not survive the sovereignty and freedom of what it used to?
19) in contradiction of human rights and patriotism you?
the ultimate goal of social activities, human rights, or that human rights is the ultimate criterion for determining right and wrong . The above also talked about the relationship between human rights and sovereignty. Starting from these reasons, we have no conflict of human rights and the issue of patriotism to make the following answer. In most cases this is no contradiction between the two, because the purpose of sovereignty using the state's power to protect human rights. If subjected to foreign aggression, the people became a conquered people, the protection of human rights will be lost. Therefore, the concept of patriotism and human rights are not contradictory. but there are a number of cases this is indeed the two contradictory. give an example. the Japanese invasion of China, the spiritual pillar of the soldiers is patriotism. Japanese soldiers fought very bravely. kamikaze known, is to use suicide plane to hit U.S. warships, they can order to the country fear no sacrifice, but this behavior is entirely incompatible with human rights concepts. because the war aim is to enslave the Chinese people, is to deprive the Chinese people's human rights. On the contrary, people who resist the Japanese invasion, consistent with patriotism, but also with the spirit of human rights. < br> the highest standards of protection of human rights, then surrender the war may be consistent with the spirit of human rights. in World War II, the United States launches an attack on Okinawa, mainland Japan, fighting more than a month, both sides suffered heavy casualties. Finally a Japanese soldier why he did not retreat . mainstay in the retreat is not surrender. not only the soldiers do not surrender, and allowed the people to surrender. Finally, the Japanese American troops rushed to the sea. Japanese forced all the people jumped into the sea to commit suicide. a village to force his mother jumped into the sea, his mother does not like, this village since the pick up sticks to his mother to death. The Battle of thousands of ordinary people Touhai suicide. This behavior is not worth promoting. But the Japanese still do not understand where they are wrong. similar There are many examples. our own history, have the same story. in the end how do we know this behavior? human rights and patriotism, there is a fundamental difference here. Only human rights real for the majority of the interests of the people.
20 ) ordinary people can play in the pursuit of what role human rights?
opposed to human rights and privileges. the people to pursue human rights, and privileges necessary to fight. but the privilege is a strong group, and it is dangerous to fight. so to pay attention to method of struggle. to use legal means to fight for human rights. but also to pay attention, do not be an accomplice of human rights violations. Some people can not tell right from wrong, that the State is always right, leadership decisions are right, even the violation of human rights also do not know wrong. himself involved in the violation of human rights of others, but that made contributions for the country. Everyone should understand clearly that only the truest of human rights. Human rights is the ultimate criterion for distinguishing right and wrong.
fundamentally , the concept of privilege is the sworn enemy of human rights. The concept of privilege is very common in our country. A person subject to government bullying, the first thought often is to find a high-ranking cadres to avenge. that is to rely on the privilege of justice. China several thousand years of history protection of human rights has never been this concept. On the contrary, many rely arbiter'd approach this justice. during his southern, anti-espionage people, this is our favorite to listen to the story. Therefore, the concept of privilege not only exists in a the minds of privileged people, the same privilege does not exist in the minds of ordinary people. and the government officials that ordinary people put into uniform. So the complete eradication of way privileges, and the people who self-education, raise their own views on human rights to inspire awareness of human rights, and then organize the defense of human rights organizations, such as trade unions, peasant associations, taxpayers associations, community organizations, to participate in the work of the jury, the trial court to attend, their views on various public occasions, and so on.
Do not think that a country from dictatorship to democracy, rule of law in the process, just a government thing, and the people nothing. On the contrary, the whole process requires the joint efforts of the government and people, which side will not work less. Ideally, these two aspects good co-ordination and speed in the pace of consensus. done well is the antagonism, and even become violent direct conflict, the country people will be at great cost. In general people are often relatively high this request, the Government side can slow the pace of consent. If coordination is not up, there is potential for conflicts. In order to avoid conflicts, it should be to persuade both sides that mutual respect, compromise and concession. The Government should consider himself a party to the difficulties it clear to the masses, we must first stand down, gradually changed from a leadership position to serve the masses. This in itself will take a long time. the people must see to understand the difficulties of the Government, be patient, to the highest good. This process may take five or ten years. In This is not a waiting period, but to do more work to do publicity, so that all parties come to accept the highest standards of human rights concepts.
21) human rights is an issue between the people and the government do?
violations First, individual human rights of the Government, not that other cases of human rights violations does not exist, but because of the government of human rights violations more difficult to resolve. In fact the situation of other human rights violations, the number of terms from the Government to be more than a violation of human rights . such as assaults against women, interference in the freedom of marriage and family in the violence, child abuse, inequality in the labor struggle enterprises, the status of the community because people can not do different legal equality now. In our personal get depends largely on the legal protection of people's social status. is the lack of legal protection of farmers groups, workers slightly better. one person on the deputies, some of more comprehensive protection of the law. If the party's Central Committee, not only adequate legal protection, and have privileges, who is also hesitant to move them. long-entrenched social hierarchy of the way into all aspects of social life. Even the monks are at the bureau level of the sub-division level. level view of re-shaping humanity. leaders to speak and have an accent uterus gas, but when officers encounter a larger, they immediately become obsequious. ordinary people naturally identify a low social status. students watched TV shows, openings will say: Chen Zuigaiwansi. were divided into three classes according to status of nine grid, who do not feel anything abnormal. quarrel between the two on the road, we often heard the saying: Do you have any great? meaning and must first more remarkable than anyone else. more officials who, who's father have a higher status. deeply rooted level of consciousness. This phenomenon hinders the establishment of an egalitarian society and development. to correct it is not easy, it is both trained three thousand years the product of imperial society. to correct it probably at least a generation.
22) how to use the non-governmental organizations for human rights.
personal power is very limited. When a person when the fight for human rights strength is very small, simply can not stand up an equal bargaining position. In order to gain a more equal bargaining position, needs the backing of organized. This organization is a non-governmental organizations generally. This is the emerging modern society, neither is the enterprise ...